You get fast, smudge-free images that, generally speaking, pass the picture-quality test. In the business, we call that 'durned fast.' A 4圆 on Premium Plus paper takes about a minute and a half to print, while prints made on Advanced paper take, according to my experience, just 18 to 20 seconds. While the Premium Plus images came out best in the image-quality testing, they were not smudge resistant like those printed on Advanced paper.īut the Advanced paper has other benefits too: when you use it, you cut printing time down dramatically. The catch is that I printed images on both the HP Advanced Photo Paper and the HP Premium Plus Glossy Photo Paper. Using special 'Advanced Photo Paper,' I was able to create smear-free prints, and in a new round of blind taste tests, most of the 8250's prints ended up in the 'good' pile. When I received the 8250, heralded by the company as a revolution in printing technology, I was eager to see what they'd done to address my beefs.

I also determined that HP printers had two problems: the HP prints were not water resistant like Epson's and Canon's, so any gooey hand could smear the ink, and that the HP's blues printed in an unnatural glow. After some blind 'taste testing' of my printouts, I concluded that Epson made great printers.

Late last year I spent several days testing printers, making 4圆 glossies on eight or ten printers from all of the manufacturers you've heard of. New player at the $200 mark, and as expected at this price, it delivers a lot of performance. Generally, $200 printers can generateīorderless 4圆s and 5x7s, and have color LCD screens and card readers so you can turn a shot into a print without turning on your computer.

That's a price point I like to watch since it's where most of the cool new technology gets introduced. Follow printers today cost far less than $200, but

Hp photosmart 8250 printer problems